Skip to Content

NY, New York City

Mission Statement

MISSION STATEMENT:

The Coffee Party Movement gives voice to Americans who want to see cooperation in government. We recognize that the federal government is not the enemy of the people, but the expression of our collective will, and that we must participate in the democratic process in order to address the challenges that we face as Americans. As voters and grassroots volunteers, we will support leaders who work toward positive solutions, and hold accountable those who obstruct them.

Starting more groups, editing current groups, etc...

 In two weeks time, Coffee Party USA will be releasing an internal Facebook type application specifically for members of the Coffee Party website.  Until then, we are asking that everyone make due with the tools they have currently.  This new platform will knock your socks off.

Please bear with us.  We built it, you came, we have to remodel.  

 

We need more CEOs thinking like General Electric's (GE) Jeffrey Immelt -- U.S. Manufacturing and Technology

I am thrilled to read a Daily Finance article that states "General Electric's (GE) Jeffrey Immelt said his company would be investing in manufacturing in its leading markets, including the U.S."

The article states "Immelt said it is wrong to assume that a country can thrive without a technology or manufacturing base. "I hope that gets beaten into the head of every American. Not that we're anywhere close to Europe, but there are things that are going on there that ought to be cautionary tales for us," he said."

See full article from DailyFinance: http://srph.it/b5TfTA

We need to change the coffee filter..

This DC bribery will destroy Obama if it continues. Clinton knew how far to push an unpopular issue on the American people and when to apply the brakes. Rahm should tell the Prez to cool it until after the elections.

Who hijacked the front page mission statement and why?????

The Coffee Party Movement gives voice to Americans who want to see cooperation in government. We recognize that the federal government is not the enemy of the people, but the expression of our collective will, and that we must participate in the democratic process in order to address the challenges that we face as Americans. As voters and grassroots volunteers, we will support leaders who work toward positive solutions, and hold accountable those who obstruct them.

Comments

Some Helpful Links :: CP Activities

hi group

hi. this is Steve Mantz. is anyone else here who was at the manhattan meetings? i was at a few.

Hi there

hi there! looks good.

Long Island, NY

This movement has promise as long as it can grow in a logical and well thought out direction. Citizens need to take back our government from the corporations and special interests. Nothing can be more troubling than to become an indentured surf of a "New World Order" run by the powerful elites.

I hope in the near future, Long Island, having been a hot bed for conservatism for sometime, can be a place where liberal minded people can organize to promote this movements agenda.

If anyone has intentions of a Long Island meeting place in Nassau and/or Suffolk counties to expand this grassroots effort, please post your ideas.

Also, I think polling the groups on several different initiatives and topics can keep the movement focused, resulting in a more effective effort.

Talk is cheap. Action is what makes the difference. By speaking out as a group in public forums and challenging our public officials to answer the tough questions is how the message gets out. And when that happens the media will take notice and spread the word. Isn't that what Democracy is all about?

Nassau Coffee Party

I'm in the process of creating a Nassau County Coffee Party. I'll keep you posted!

What flavor will Coffee be?

I can only hope, that in the rush to counter the mayhem of the Republicans, Democrats and the shrieks of the Tea Party, the well meaning folks of this early movement tread thoughtfully enough to preserve and protect the potential of public empowerment. Because that would be the most profound gift we could give each other and the generations to come.

We live in the time of nodding heads, when corporations and politicians send surveys that reinforce their own agendas. Few are looking for a new paradigm. Most want simply to justify their own actions while pretending involvement.

For me, I'll take my coffee black - no sugar, no cream. Imagine a world re imaged around real human need, not career pols and self serving corporations.

Imagine

Imagine there's no country, it isn't hard to do. Nothing to live or die for, no religion too. Imagine all the world living life in peace... Hopey fantasy won't happen people.

Brooklyn

I was chatting with some folks at the Bleeker Street Tavern meeting today (March 13th), and it sounds like we need a Brooklyn meeting. So I'm looking for suggestions regarding time and location.

This could be on March 27th, the next official meeting, or earlier.

There's Tea Lounge, in Park Slope, which is big.
There's also Vox Pop Cafe, which is suitable since it kind of functions as a community center.

Ideas?

Brooklyn

If you are going to hold a meeting in Brooklyn, the location must be easily accessible i.e. near public transportation.

I think the best places should be either in Downtown Brooklyn near (Borough Hall, Court St stations) or near the Atlantic Pacific hub.

Brooklyn

Good idea. Do you know of any suitable coffee shops or bars in those areas? I'm not so familiar with those locations.

Brooklyn

I'm up for a Brooklyn meet-up. Where can we organize for this? Do I just keep checking this thread?

Emmons Ave Cafe???

Hey There is a coffee and crepe place in sheepshead bay that is not to hard to find. Its called XO Creperie right on Emmons avenue.

Outer boroughs

Please don't forget about those of us who live in the outer boroughs. I live in Queens and know that many of my neighbors share the goals of the Coffee Party.

New York Liberal State of Mind Blog

Thought some people would be interested in taking a peek.

http://nyliberalstateofmind.blogspot.com/

early concerns

Hi,

I'm very excited to work with everyone, but maybe I haven't dug deep enough to find the answers to these questions but I have a few concerns.

1) Is this a liberal/democrat counter point to the tea parties or is this a nonpartisan, common sense, approach to impacting government to be more efficient, inclusive, and less representative of corporate interests. I'm not interested in the Democrat's agenda, and I feel we can be limiting ourself if we fall in line. For me, my life is less impacted by health care reform and more so student loans, which is probably being stripped from the final version. I'm not saying one is more important than the other, but I don't want to lose focus on the prize, which are issues that both parties aren't addressing.

2) What do we mean by "intellectual"? I always took it that government needs to serve everyone, and I don't think you need to know the details of the reconciliation process if you are stuck without a job, and I think we need to address these issues.

3) How much of a target is the main stream media? I find MSNBC as damaging to political discourse as Fox or Drudge.

4) How much focus is there on local government efficiency? A lot can be done locally and people seem to never want to engage our communities as much. That could be a great nitch for us. I know some people who worked to create an application that explained local policy in normal language for people so they could understand and act when needed. Is this something we might be interested in going towards?

5) Who is running the show behind the curtains? Who's idea was this all to begin with?

Ideal, New Subject Matter for the Meetings

Fellow Citizens,

I may have stumbled upon the answer.

I have authored a book that explains a specific strategy to regain control of our federal government. Though listening carefully, I’ve heard of no other solutions being offered so far. The book includes as yet unspoken analysis, entirely unique perspectives, a full explanation of the logic leading to my conclusions and a step-by-step plan that could enable the masses to re-establish control of our Federal government. Here's a sample

Votimate Our Politics

Our country needs a new way of doing business. Under the current system politicians have many motivations. This strategy could reduce their need for multiple motivations. This strategy could help create a system where politicians are:

Votimated

Politicians Motivated for Votes Only

PREFACE

We’ve heard from the Politicians, the Pundits, the Experts and from all of those who can buy a platform from which to speak, yet nary an answer for that which ails our country. Clearly it is getting worse with no end in sight. Perhaps it is time to hear from “Joe Public.”

I can’t say that I speak for the 99%, but I come from the 99% and after losing everything, perhaps even the bottom percent. How can the 1% get away with robbing and causing such harm to the 99% when the 99% of us control the vote? Armed only with the logic of a layman and the urgent need of a pauper I drilled down deep into this dilemma and made some discoveries that might be worth hearing.

The first several chapters offer unique, unspoken perspectives, intended to expose, categorize, organize and simplify the basic core issues within the bigger issue, our politics, or more specifically, our lack of effective governance for the 99%. The next several chapters offer unique comparative analysis, completely “out of the beltway” ideas and surprisingly possible solutions to the core problems. The final few chapters include stunning, previously undisclosed analysis exposing clearly why we must take action soon - and what the result of taking action could mean for us.

This is not just conceptual. I propose specific action. This is “nuts and bolts.” This is “what’s the next step”, a potential roadmap to restoring a government that works for us, the 99%. Restoring our democracy is the only issue worth talking about. Until we adapt and upgrade our political system, the 99% will continue to lose. Until we do, nothing else matters. Without a functioning government, we have nothing.

INTRODUCTION

I’m not experienced with politics and have no education in economics. Like many, I’ve lost everything and see little happening to bring me hope while watching our country implode seemingly like never before. This is saying a lot because at 54 years old, I survived the horrific Richard Nixon 30,000-dead-to-get-re-elected-war/impeach-a-crook-Watergate era.

Many of us are in need of hope. They say that need is the mother of invention. America is in need of solutions. While most solutions to complex issues include in-depth analysis and long explanations, true also in this case, like most straightforward arguments, mine too has a short answer. So I’ll cut to the chase and work my way backward.

In January 2010, while watching the disturbing display of the four “Too Big To Fail” banksters acting innocent and clueless in front of Congress, I found myself wondering, “How can our country become as successful as these corporations have become?” Even more to the point, how can we, Joe Public, benefit from our government like their shareholders benefit from their successful banking corporations? After all, who would argue that those corporations have pimped our system and punked us all? We know it. They know it. Everyone knows it.

Simply put, it is an industry licensed by, governed by and residing in the United States of America that has become more powerful than the Federal Government of The United States of America. That’s a mouthful. Other than two senseless wars, this is the worst realization of my lifetime. It’s huge. It cannot be overstated. It is bleeding us dry and I don’t see it changing on it’s own. It has stolen our Democracy. But what on earth can we do about it?

The status quo approach would be to peck away at it with legislation that will start with good intentions, but with powerful lobby bribes end up watered down, rendered ineffective and/or reversed by the next congress and administration. First, it is: our political/governing system needs an overhaul from the bottom up. It no longer works, which begs one of many questions, “which specific part is broken?”

To that purpose, I analyzed the differences between how the Wall Street banksters and health insurance providers do business from within their system – the free market corporate model – and compared it to the way the U.S. Government, does business from within our current political/governing system. I drilled down deep and what I found astounded me and might surprise you too. They are very different. Ergo, it’s the differences in the two structures/systems that allow the banksters and insurance providers to be so successful while operating from within theirs and what makes our government fail while operating from within ours, which allows private industry to dominate us.

By comparing the structures side-by-side it became obvious; the deficiencies in our system of governing are glaring and alarming when compared to their adapted, efficiently incentivized system. Upon identifying it the ultimate question arose, “how can we fix it?” The answer to fixing it is surprisingly obvious and has been readily apparent all along, despite the requisite in-depth analysis and long explanation disclosed herein.

My argument’s short answer is to propose applying elements of their successful free market corporate model to our system of politics and governance and we, Joe Public, should be rewarded like shareholders of a successful corporation. Once you go to this simple, logical perspective fantastic advantages naturally arise benefiting the citizens of America, not just the chosen few as it is now. On the following pages I will propose specific, step-by-step methods to reigning in the parasites.

Paradigm Shift

In my view, we can’t expect this type of “system overhaul” perspective and change to come from – or to be driven by – politicians fighting for their careers within our broken system. Ever since special interest groups have been counting profits in the billions, maybe even trillions, they’re far too powerful and already own our political/governing system.

If ever a “grass roots movement” were needed, it is for this “paradigm shift.” The 99% must conceive and drive this change and do it soon or our beloved country will implode from the unintended consequences of insatiable special interest capitalism. So let’s take a page from those who are doing it to us and make it work for us. With the strategy outlined herein, “we the shareholders” can take our government back from special interests.

United and armed with this plan, we can simply insist.

To find out more, visit votimate.com. I have lowered the cost for the “download” format to my cost only, $1.49, through Friday, March 12. You can find the “download” option just under the “Add to Cart” button on the right side of my publisher’s page. By Saturday, March 13th, the price will go back to $10 for the immediate download and Ebook versions. You won't be disappointed.

Best wishes, JP Sayles

Verification sources

This is the first deep breath I have taken in 10 years, politically speaking. Thanks to the founders for creating this option for discourse and action.

A current interest I have is to compile an annotated list of verification sources to combat the overwhelming (to me) volume of lies, damned lies, and statistics pouring in. So far, I have these sources and would appreciate comments.

1. wikipedia
2. snopes.com
3. factcheck.com
4. CNN Fact Check

Mega thanks,
BonnieS

Hi, Bonnie: I'm also interested in facts

Hi, Bonnie,

I'm also interested in the issue of misinformation.

Three of us (so far) have agreed to create just such a resource to include all you've listed, plus a bibliography, and a refresher course on rhetoric and logical fallacies (including a short video) and anything else we can come up with. We hope to have a video conference (via Skype or iChat) in the next week or so.

We're talking about it in the forums over here:

http://www.coffeepartyusa.com/content/media-user-manual-toolkit-project

Can use all the help we can get for sure.

The correct URL is

The correct URL is factcheck.org rather than factcheck.com, by the way.

I've found the following

I've found the following nonpartisan sources to be very informative:

* CBO Director's Blog: http://cboblog.cbo.gov/
* TaxVox: http://taxvox.taxpolicycenter.org/

As well as the following left of center sources:

* Uwe E Reinhardt at Economix: http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/author/uwe-e-reinhardt/
* Ezra Klein: http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/
* Paul Krugman's Blog: http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/
* Paul Krugman's Column: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/15/opinion/15krugman.html
* Brad DeLong: http://delong.typepad.com

Great idea

I like listening to the radio show http://www.onthemedia.org
also try http://mediamatters.org which offers some useful filter for the slanted media.

Lastly have you read the recent editorial "Democracy is a Pesky Thing" by John Meacham in NewsWeek which tip toes around the topic of bias in the media, and seems to make light of the lack of real journalism vs. the infotainment and propaganda that passes for news these days. http://www.newsweek.com/id/234582

Verification Sources

I like politifact.com

verification sources

Thanks. That goes on the list.

A Coffee Party Manifesto(?)

I was wondering if you guys believe we, as liberals, should create a manifesto of general guidelines that all members of the Coffee Party could agree upon, potentially to include such themes as:

*Government is an agent of the people, which is why we elect Representatives and Senators, and as such, government is expected to protect the citizenry with federal programs

OR

*Members of government must be held accountable for their actions.

I'm 17, so, I'm just starting out with this political activism and I've wanted for the better part of a year for a Coffee Party to be formed so I could join. Now, here I am! XD

Karl Marx is the answer..

Obama is bringing communism to America fast and I am thrilled..

Communism?

Why does everyone think Obama is a communist or socialist? What leads you believe this?

The point is we have to do what's good for America, not just one portion or one group of people, but for everyone. America consists of over 200 million people, its a large undertaking to make changes on that scale.

This Country needs more young minds

This country needs fresh thinkers to change it back to the way of the people -- all the people not just the few that can afford to buy their way into the favor of the polition's pocket.

having a point of view

This is a great idea. I was just listening to National Public Radio and a spokes person from "The Coffee Party USA" was on and was asked by the host what the objective was of this group and he was unable to provide a clear answer.

If we stand a chance of getting the message out there we'd need to have a clear voice and position on the direction and policies of our country.

March 13

So, what's the plan for March 13th? Is there a meeting place? I wasn't able to attend the March 7th meeting. I see someone on facebook mentioned meeting at Nohostar, near the west village, at 12:30pm. Is that the official spot for the 13th?

Thanks.

Results of first meeting?

Anyone want to comment on what happened at the first meeting?

I was at meeting

I was at the first meeting, on March 7th in Manhattan on W 48th St. We mainly discussed how each of us see the group developing. We agreed that everyone should take the time to read the materials available at the group's main website, such as the civility pledge, etc. (will try to post a little bit more details later, if I have some time.)

terminology

I think it would be best to avoid trying to use typical labels - liberal, neoconservative, etc to define something that has begun for the intent of NOT playing into existing stereotypes. If the coffee party is truly grassroots and about supporting government for the good of the people, let's use regular, descriptive words to talk about the practical goals we would like to see. Jumping into labeling is human nature, we want to define and categorize people and viewpoints, but look where that has got us. The coffee party is supposedly an alternative to rampant labeling and the entrenched partisanship that results. Let's just be you and me working on solving problems and moving forward.

response to practical good

practicalgood,

I think you have hit the nail on the head. We Americans have obvious common goals, the physical and economic health and future of our country. If I want to hear rants from either the conservative or liberal prospective, I know whom to ask. What attracts me to this group is its practicality. We have to be civil, we have to define goals for our government, prioritize and probably come up with some discrete suggestions. We may disagree with what will work, how to accomplish the goals. We are not experts in health care, economics, foreign policy. But the most important thing, as I see it, is to remind the government that they are governing not just for a few years, not just to get re-elected, but to build a stronger country for us all. As a New York State resident, our state legislature is a prime example of stagnation.

No Names or Stero-types

Everytime, I hear liberal or conservative or any other political term, I cringe. I think we are too focused on the actually terminology and a perceived idea rather than working together to make real changes. Not everyone wants to change, and that is expected but, we have to not give words power by continually using them.

One thing we can do is offer up education material on what we do and how we intend to do it, we can't favor any one ideal, we have to incorporate from as many different reliable and proven policies as possible.

Probably Attend

Looks like I can probably attend. Let's talk about politics!

Cannot Attend

I cannot attend this Sunday but can somebody take down some form of minutes or general notes of the proceedings and post it on the facebook page. Just so we can get an idea of where this all might be heading.

Facebook Organized Meeting

Hey Coffee Partiers! I'm simply relaying a meeting time and place for this weekend that have been established on the NYC Chapter Facebook page, where we already have around 600 members.

"We have a space for our informal meet and greet this Sunday, March 7, at 2pm. We have the second floor of Le Monde Gourmet Deli. It's located at 38 West 48th Street between 5th and 6th avenue. We can meet each other and plan how we want to do the national kick-off on March 13."

Hope this helps! See you all there!

can't make it this weekend

Out of town, but can make it to the event on the 13th. Looking forward to it!

also here

I'm here too. I'm open to attending a meeting.

Sunday afternoon meeting?

Since we already have 81 members and are growing rapidly, maybe we should think about meeting in person. How about a coffee shop near Houston Street on Sunday around 4pm. I am open minded about meeting spots, those Housing Works is good for this kind of meeting. We can brainstorm, take notes, and post it for the group.

Meeting

Sunday at 4 sounds good to me if enough people are interested. Are there any other threads concerning meeting in person? Also, of the 81 you say are on here, I'm wondering how many are actually in Manhattan. I'm in Brooklyn, although I'm willing to trek a bit.

Thanks to Janos

Words, their meaning, their use, and the truth

You cannot win a political fight anymore by catergorizing people. Conservative, moderate, Liberal, Progressive, Miniorty, are just words and can often be used against you. Once you describe yourself as a whatever your views are for the most part assumed and predetermined. I feel that we should examine POLICY, FUNDING, HOW A BILL HELPS OR HURTS THE PEOPLE, WHAT CAN BE GAINED OR LOST BY SUPPORTING OR FIGHTING A BILL, A GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL OR THEIR POSITION, HOW SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS NEGATIVELY OR POSITIVELY AFFECT THE THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT, ETC. I have more to say on this topic but not now. I look forward to future encounters. A great idea the coffee party. Let's see if we can make it work.

Generalizations, in general...

"Moderate" and "Extremist" mean very different things to different people. For example, I consider myself just a regular "liberal" or "progressive," but as pointed out, in this atmosphere, I could be considered a "radical left-wing extremist."

I'd suggest avoiding emotionally charged terms and focus on "common sense" goals. And probably those goals should be articulated.

ease of site and joining

I don't tweet, blog, or webpage. I do however email. I once was a Deaner. I now live in NYC. Let's meet. I know places that can be used and are free.

What now?

Are there any plans to meet? To rally? To form an official platform?

I have a few suggestions...in no particular order:

1. Engage in conversations about the issues. No name-calling or accusations. Criticism of policy is acceptable, but questioning a person's motives or character is not.

2. All Americans are real Americans.

3. Health care in this country needs reform. If you would like to bring tort, insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security or other reform to the table as possible parts of the solution, then we welcome your input.

4. Say it, don't spray it. Screaming may accomplish a little in the short run, but it will not accomplish anything in the long run.

5. Target independents. We must accept the fact that no matter how reasonable an argument is, extremists and those entrenched in their views will not hear it.

That's all I have off the top of my head. I'd love for someone to expand on these ideas.

Agreed...

Real tort reform, across state insurance reform, pharma cost controls, triming healthcare fraud. These are the reasons for reform.. Prez Obama where are you?

Health Care

We don't need "health care reform" There is nothing wrong with our health care.
It's "Insurance Reform" that's the big problem. The way we buy insurance to the way insurance is controlled by the state. The insurance commissioner says where and how your policy can be sold and what company you, the consumer, can buy from.

It will be exceptionally hard to kill this golden egg system, there is an enormous amount of money at stake for the politicos. And you thought they had your interest at heart!!!!!

fresh-ground-beans, I would

fresh-ground-beans,

I would very much disagree. We spend way too much on health care. See the following article for an introduction:

http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/14/why-does-us-health-care-cos...

health care

That article is stating exactly what I said. Insurance reform will reduce the amount spent on non-care overhead.
You do understand how your state insurance commission fits into the problem do you not ?

Take my example for an instance. I am retired and have been for a while. My is not old enough to retire nor get medicare. We need to buy a policy just for her. This is easier said than done because she was always covered by my work insurance. Now that she needs to buy, we find there are only 3 companies that we can apply to because the structure of insurance available for sale in our area. These companies have certain rates set by the state and territories where they may sell. I cannot go our of my area to buy, it isn't allowed. we are stuck paying an inflated rate because NY state has a lot of uninsured non-citizens using the system.
This is NOT a health care problem, this is an insurance problem. My level of available health care would not change only the price I pay if I can buy where I want and what I want.

fresh-ground-beans, I

fresh-ground-beans,

I absolutely agree that we need health insurance reform, especially on the individual market (the market your wife is trying to buy in now). I disagree, however, about the following:

* You write that "The article is stating exactly what I said." In the article, Uwe E Reinhardt does say a prominent factor of high US health care costs is that "significantly higher administrative overhead costs than are incurred in other countries with simpler health-insurance systems," but also lists 3 other prominent factors.

* You seem to be arguing that you should be able to buy insurance across state lines. There are a number of reasons why this is bad, but let us consider why this would be bad for your particular situation. New York has guaranteed issue and pure community rating on its individual market. This means that health insurance companies on the individual market cannot deny people insurance or charge people higher prices based on age, gender, pre-existing conditions, or any other factors. In effect, younger/healthier people are subsidizing older/less healthy people. Most states do not have guaranteed issue or community rating, however. If people could buy insurance across state lines, then we can expect many young healthy people in New York to go to another state where they can buy insurance without subsidizing older/less healthy people. This would have the effect of raising New York premiums on older/less healthy people. The older/less healthy people could go to another state, but we can expect them to face high premiums wherever they go. If your wife is close to retirement age, then she would likely be far worse off if people could buy health insurance across state lines.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Syndicate content