Skip to Content

Blogs

The World's "Job Creators" Are Hiding 21 Trillion Dollars from Their Home Governments Using Off-Shore Tax Havens

by Eric Byler

This graphic from Heather Stewart's article in The Guardian UK shows where the world's super-rich are hiding $21,000,000,000,000 (21 trillion dollars) in wealth from their home governments.  

Who knows what words they use to justify such injustice abroad, but here, the words are "Job Creators" and "Trickle-down Economics." Now, it's true that some wealth trickles down, and some who have wealth do create jobs. But for the most part, wealth sneaks out the back door to avoid taxation. 

Whether its safety regulations, consumer protections, environmental protection, or taxation, what the super rich are saying to us is: "We don't wish to follow the laws of this country because doing so would reduce our wealth." 

As we've seen with the flood of money they're spending on Super-PAC's, many in our ruling class don't mind spending mightily for the privilege of making our laws.   But this is still a Republic if we can keep it. To do that, we must go to the polls and vote. We must assert our right as "We the People" to make the laws in this country, and to require all our citizens follow the law, even the ones who call themselves "Job Creators."

PS: Isn't it funny how "Job Creators" rhymes so well with "Tax Evaders?"  Someone needs to write a song, make a bumper sticker, or an info-graphic with that one.

CLICK HERE for a larger version of this graphic.   |  Join our Facebook discussion about this topic

In Bipartisan Vote, Massachusetts Senate Calls on Congress to Enact Constitutional Amendment Reversing Citizens United

In overwhelming vote of 35-1 State Senate
calls for Constitutional amendment to restore self-governance

BOSTON – The Massachusetts State Senate today passed a resolution calling on the United State Congress to enact a federal Constitutional Amendment to reverse the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, and restore fair elections and constitutional rights to the people.

The State Senate passed its resolution by an overwhelming bipartisan vote of 35 to 1, with all Republicans joining all but one Democrat in approving it.  Attention now turns to the House as the end of the legislative session approaches.

The 2010 Citizens United decision overturned decades-old laws restricting corporate expenditures, ruling that they violated the First Amendment’s protection of free speech. The decision dramatically expanded the fabricated “corporate rights” doctrine and has unleashed a flood of corporate money into federal, state, and local elections.

“The Citizens United decision dramatically dilutes the voice of every American who does not control a large corporate treasury,” said Sen. Jamie Eldridge, the original sponsor of the bill. “The health of our democracy and the integrity of our political system are at stake, and I am proud of the Senate for passing this resolution today and sending a strong message that our democracy isn't for sale."

In the wake of the Citizens United decision, campaign spending by outside groups has skyrocketed. In the 2010 election cycle, the first since the Supreme Court decision, outside groups spent nearly $300 million.

“The fundamental question facing the nation today is whether people or corporations shall govern in America,” said John Bonifaz, the co-founder and director of Free Speech For People, a national campaign launched on the day of the Citizens United ruling to press for an Amendment to the Constitution to overturn the ruling and make clear that corporations are not people with constitutional rights. “With the strong bipartisan passage of this resolution, Massachusetts will help to lead the way in restoring American democracy to the people,” Bonifaz said.

Super PACs have emerged as a result of the Supreme Court’s decision, amassing huge amounts of money used for attack ads, such as those aired this past spring during the Republican presidential candidate primaries. Super PACs are expected to spend hundreds of millions of dollars in the 2012 elections, breaking all previous records.

“Big corporations aren’t run by the 99 percent – or even by the 1 percent. Rather, they are run by a super-wealthy 0.01 percent,” said Avi Green, Executive Director of MassVOTE. “Politics should be for all of us – not just the super-wealthy and the big corporations they control. Kudos to the Senatefor recognizing this and supporting this resolution.”

“Massachusetts is a step closer to joining the several states and hundreds of communities nationwide who’ve issued similar resolutions,” said Mark Hays, campaign coordinator for Public Citizen’s Democracy Is For People Campaign. “With leadership from the states, we’re demonstrating that amending the Constitution to challenge the corrosive impacts of money in politics is no pipe dream, but is a mainstream vision for a democracy that serves the people, not giant corporations.”

Cities and towns across the nation have voted on similar measures. In Massachusetts, 68 communities have voted in favor of a Constitutional Amendment including Boston, Springfield and Worcester.  If a similar resolution is passed by the House, Massachusetts will join the state legislatures in California, Hawaii, Maryland, New Mexico, Rhode Island, and Vermont in voicing their states’ opposition to the decision and support for a Constitutional Amendment to address its ramifications.

“We are delighted that the Senate has taken bipartisan action to address this disastrous decision,” said Pam Wilmot, Executive Director of Common Cause Massachusetts. “A campaign for a Constitutional Amendment is no easy task, but the US Supreme Court left us no choice. Only with a constitutional amendment can we address the problem of money in politics that it, with other decisions, has created. Passing this resolution has put Massachusetts on the forefront of that critical effort, which, as the cradle of liberty, is where we should be.”

"We congratulate the Senate on passage of this resolution, and urge the House to do so as well.  It is past time to limit the impact of large amounts of money, often from donors whose identity is not public, on our elections," said Eva Valentine, president of the League of Women Voters of Massachusetts.

Citizen Journalist Account of Historic US Senate Hearing on Overturning Citizens United

by Sally Lau, Herndon, VA

The US Senate hearing on overturning Citizens United was an excellent, impressive learning experience with former GOP presidential candidate Buddy Roemer and Harvard Law professor (and Coffee Party philosopher in chief) Lawrence Lessig testifying.  Both gave very strong arguments to validate and pursue a Constitutional Amendment to overturn the Citizens United Supreme Court decision  [see video].

Those of us who were in attendance were particularly intrigued by Lessig's suggested solution — one thing that's great about his books is they always include a solution, not just complaints.  Lessig suggested four, regional "citizen conventions" for which 300 citizens would be selected at random, not unlike jury duty.  This was in response to Sen. Richard Durbin's question about how we could keep the amendment process from being corrupted by the ruling class in the same way our democracy has been.  After the hearing, Lessig told me that the idea for these "citizen conventions" originated with the Coffee Party!  Wow!  It turns out that Coffee Party founder Annabel Park had put together a "Mock Constitutional Convention" which Lessig co-chaired with GOP strategist Mark McKinnon at the first ever national meet-up for the Coffee Party in 2010 [major takeaways  |  mock convention video ].

I'm so proud and pleased to have had the opportunity to meet and talk to such a superb Constitutional lawyer and distinguished professor.  He really does listen to the ideas emanating from ordinary, lay citizens.  Not only was he the most effective speaker at the hearing, he was was quick to defend President Obama when Ilya Shapiro of the Cato Institute criticized the President's statements about the "Citizens United."  Lessig pretty much destroyed everything Shapiro said, but he did it respectfully, and I was glad that the Republicans had a witness to advocate for unlimited contributions by international corporations to influence our elections.

I liked Lessig's observation that We the People still have the Voting Election, but we have lost the Money Election."  He pointed out that a tiny fraction of our society — 22 people, or 7 one-millionths of 1% — account for 50% of the Money Election. And the problem is that the Money Election determines the options We the People have to choose form in the Voting Election. Buddy Roemer added a humorous yet serious,  down-to-earth impression on the panel.  Lots of laughs and cheers from the audience when the former Congressman and Louisiana Governor spoke. Roemer shared that there was a fund-raising litmus test that kept him from participating in any of the 23 episodes of the GOP Presidential Debate Show.  His best line was "The system isn't broken, it's bought."  

The hearing opened with outstanding speeches and appeals from Sen. Max Baccus, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, Sen. Bernie Sanders, Sen. Tom Udall, Rep. Donna Edwards, Sen. Chris Coons, and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (whom I met at Netroots convention this June in Providence), Sen. Richard Blumenthal, and Sen. Dick Durbin who chaired the hearing.  Each one presented strong support and reasons for an amendment. 

There were so many people in attendance that I did not get to sit in the actual Senate Hearing Room 216.  Many of us were allowed to view the hearing on a screen in the overflow room in the adjacent Dirksen building.  Afterwards, I made my way back to 216 and I was so happy to see Annabel Park there talking with Prof. Lessig.  In addition to getting to meet Lessig, I met his cute 8 year old son.  I also met Marge Baker of People for the American Way, Adam Green, and others. 

I would really like to thank the Coffee Party for organizing petitions and letters in support of this hearing, and for reaching out to all our members so we could be there in person or watch on the Internet. 

Concerned Citizens Deliver 1.9 Million Petitions to Overturn Citizens United via Constitutional Amendment

by Calvin Sloan
 
In support of today's first ever Senate Hearing on Citizens United, concerned citizens will deliver at least 1,959,063 signatures calling for overturning Citizens United and related cases by amending the Constitution.
 
The petitions were gathered in support of  hearings held by the Constitution Subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee to examine the impact of unlimited, often anonymous spending to influence election results, and the need for constitutional remedies to restore the democratic promise of America. The people whose names appear on these petitions reflect the deep-seated public concern about the state of our democracy and the growing grassroots movement to restore government, of, by, and for the people.  

“Taking Back Our Democracy: Responding to Citizens United and the Rise of Super PACs" 

WATCH LIVE  July 24, 2012  |  2:30 PM Eastern Time  |  Hart 21

Marge Baker, Executive Vice President of People For the American Way:

“The interests of the American people should be front and center in our elections, and today, 2 million people made that point loud and clear. But despite the message we sent Congress today, all over the country, our voices are being drowned out by the powerful corporations and the super wealthy. Short of changing who sits on the Supreme Court, amending the Constitution is the only way to undo the damage done to our democracy by Citizens United. The American people overwhelmingly support that idea, and by holding these hearings, our elected representatives are honoring the millions of Americans who are calling for a Constitution that ensures that “We the People” means all the people, not just the privileged few.”
 

Leslie Watson MalachiDirector of African American Ministers in Action, a program of People For the American Way:

“This petition drive proves that our collective voice can be the spark of change. Because millions of people have signed their names to proclaim that our democracy is not for sale, this grassroots movement has the power to take back our elections and ensure government by people through fair and transparent elections. We’ve made it clear to our elected representatives that a constitutional amendment is necessary to uphold that ideal. These hearings show how far this movement has come.”
 

Robert Weissman, President of Public Citizen:

“The choice is simple: We can have a working democracy, in which the people rule, or we can have aCitizens United-facilitated plutocracy, in which giant corporations and the super-rich dominate elections. Rescuing our democracy requires that we overturn Citizens United and other decisions that constitutionalize the “right” of corporations and the super-rich to buy elections. With no prospect of the Court revisiting the damaging decisions it has inflicted, we need a constitutional amendment to reestablish the simple principle that Democracy is for People.”
 

Justin Ruben, Executive Director of MoveOn.org Political Action:

“We've seen this summer how a handful of billionaires are trying to buy the election.  That's one of the reasons nearly 700,000 MoveOn members have spoken out in favor of overturning Citizens United, getting big money out of our elections, and preventing our democracy from being sold to the highest bidder.”
 

Becky Bond, Political Director of CREDO Action:

“How can the American people have an equal voice in our democracy when corporations are flooding the political system with millions in secret campaign donations? We must pass a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United, end corporate personhood and help get shadowy money out of politics for good.”
 

Bob Edgar, President & CEO of Common Cause:

“Super PACs have transformed our elections into the sport of kings. Billionaires and corporations are pooling unlimited sums of money into joint accounts, pledging astronomical sums in support of or opposition to candidates, and recklessly drowning out the voices of the American people. These corporations and mega donors are motivated by an expectation of influence and access, often at the expense of the public interest. We cannot afford to auction off our vibrant democracy to the highest bidder.”
 

Lisa Graves, the Executive Director of the Center for Media and Democracy/ ALECexposed.org:

"While billionaires are openly writing million-dollar checks to Super PACs, millions more is being secretly funneled to front groups whose ads may affect who wins and wields power over people and policy.  Deceptively named nonprofit groups are becoming the Swiss bank accounts of elections, receiving secret multi-million dollar gifts that buy ads to influence how Americans vote. We may never know the true identity of those attempting to buy our elections through such shadowy groups -- whether they are corporations or people, domestic or foreign -- but we do know American democracy is increasingly for sale and that's why We the People are demanding that the Constitution be amended to fight this corruption." 
 

Peter Schurman, Campaign Director at Free Speech For People:

“For a campaign we all knew would be difficult, the Senate hearing today is a major milestone: it shows that the growing movement for a constitutional amendment is starting to make a dent in Washington. It's time for Congress and the states to overrule the Supreme Court and make it clear that we the people, not we the corporations, are in charge of American democracy.”
 

Blair Bowie of U.S. PIRG:

“For nearly forty years, the Supreme Court has been driving us down a road that will inevitably dead end in the demise of American democracy. In equating money with speech the Court rejected the notion that in a democracy the size of your wallet should not determine the volume of your voice. Instead it enshrined the rights of artificial entities and ultra-wealthy individuals to drown out the voices of ordinary citizens in a flood of often secret cash. Ultimately, we can only get out of this judicial rut by amending the U.S. Constitution to clarify to the Supreme Court that the first amendment was never meant to be used as a tool for special interests to co-opt our democratic process. Today’s hearing and the massive citizen mobilization across the country since Citizens United show that the American people are ready to turn this car around.”
 

Eric Byler, President of the Coffee Party Board of Directors:

“Public awareness about money in politics is growing rapidly and crossing all cultural and political divides. Just like the founders of this nation, we are responding to an abuse of power by elite profiteers who feel entitled to govern over people. The task before us is to finish what our founders started — not to start a revolution but to complete one — by amending the Constitution and reestablishing the right to self-governance for people; not profiteers.” [MORE]

Petition to Overturn Citizens United

“Taking Back Our Democracy: Responding to Citizens United and the Rise of Super PACs" 

WATCH LIVE at 2:30 PM Eastern Time July 24, 2012

MORE INFO   |   

Tonight at 8 pm, we'll have a report from Washington on how it went on The Middle Ground, the Coffee Party Radio show hosted by Michael Charney and Eric Byler. The call-in number is 646-929-2495 (you can call to listen, and then hit 1 if you want to speak). Or click here to listen on the web.
 

"Who the hell is Grover Norquist Anyway?!?" —30 years of Voodoo has put the US economy in a whole lot of doo-doo

Norquist Emerges as Barrier to U.S. Debt Deal

by Don Manning

Tonight on Coffee Party Radio: "Who the hell is Grover Norquist anyway?" That's what  President H. W. Bush said recently of the man who wants to drown our Republic in the bath tub, and, to whom many in Congress pledge their loyalty instead of the U. S. of A.

Speaking of America

Mondays 8 to 10 pm Pacific Time (11 pm to 1 am ET)

Thirty years of "Voodoo" has put the US economy in a lot of Doo-doo. Tonight Don Manning is your host as we examine how and why. 

Help us take a closer look at Grover's royalist agenda, and how he uses big money and big media to enforce it on the GOP, and on our country. How does one millionaire wield so much power over the elected officials sent to Washington to represent We the People? Is this democracy at work, or more "in your face" corrupution and politics as usual?"

Also, did you know that nearly 2 million signatures are being presented tomorrow at the  historic hearing in the United States Senate on the impacts of Super-PAC's and "Citizens United?"  We'll send a Coffee Party T-shirt to the caller who can best connect our two main subjects: Grover & Citizens United!

Or, just call in and tell us what's on your mind.  We love hearing from ya!

And, don't forget tomorrow night at 5 pm PT (8 pm ET) it's The Middle Ground with Michael Charney and Eric Byler. They'll talk about the Senate hearings on Citizens United. 

Sunday 5 pm ET on Coffee Party Radio: Debunking Four Spending Myths Keeping U.S. from Recovery

​​THE BOTTOM LINE with Jessica English

Sundays 5 pm to 6:30 pm eastern time (2 pm to 3:30 pm PT)

 

Our guest on The Bottom Line Sunday, Mattea Kramer, writes in her latest piece that high-profile claims of fantasy, fear only hold back America's resources from being used to spur economy

Please join us Sunday at 5 pm ET (2 pm PT) as Jessica English welcomes Mattea Kramer of National Priorities Project as her guest. Mattea's article, Four Spending Myths Holding Up the Economy, has been bouncing all over the Internet, including TomDispatch, CBS News, Mother Jones, Huffington Post, and Salon.

Mattea's research suggests that the US economy is being held back by policy made politically viable, not by facts or evidence, but by the power of media products and think tanks funded by the super-wealthy. As we approach Tuesday's historic Senate hearing about the impact of Super PAC's and "Citizens United," Jessica English will ask Mattea if it's really true that the best thing for our economy is to give our money to those who are already wealthy and stop investing in We the People.  And, if not, how did it come to pass that so many people think so?

My favorite (actually least favorite) Myth was #4: The Affordable Care Act -- Obamacare -- will bankrupt the federal government while levying the biggest tax in U.S. history.

Here are the others: 

Spending Myth 1: Today's deficits have taken us to a historically unprecedented, economically catastrophic place.

Spending Myth 2: Military and other national security spending have already taken their lumps and future budget-cutting efforts will have to take aim at domestic programs instead.

Spending Myth 3: Government health-insurance programs are more costly than private insurance.

For the victims and families of the Aurora Theater Shooting: donate space on your blog or website

iGivefirst

An Inventive, New Way to Give: To help the victims and families of the Aurora Theater Shooting, you can donate, and/or embed a Donate Button on your website. Cut and paste the CODE below into your blog or website and this donate button will be displayed:  



<!-- ********************* INVOCATION CODE *************** -->

<img style="cursor: pointer; margin:0 0 0 0;" onclick="window.open('http://www.givebutton.net/www/delivery/ck.php?zoneid=403&amp%3Bn=a520ef25&amp%3Bcb=1342802687354','mywindow','location=0,status=0,scrollbars=0, width=820,height=550');" src='http://www.givebutton.net/www/delivery/avw.php?zoneid=403&amp%3Bcb=1342802687354&amp%3Bn=a520ef25' border="0" alt="iGivefirst" />

<!-- ***************************************************** -->

The donate button gives people a choice of several highly-respected Denver-area charities working to help the victims and families of the Aurora Theater Shooting.

MORE INFO at: www.iGivefirst.com

 

Voter Polarization and Voter Suppression - is the battle for 4 Million swing votes tossing CIVILITY into the wind?

Thursdays at noon Pacific:
Lunch with Louden

 

by Jeanene Louden

According to pollster Frank Luntz, most Americans have set their flag for a presidential candidate, so the billions about to be spent is for the benefit of 4 million undecided voters in eight battleground states.

What are your thoughts about NBC accepting ad buys for political ads during the Olympics?  Reported so far:

  • Restore Our Future (Super PAC supporting Romney) has bought $7.2 million
  • Obama Re-election Campaign $6.5 million

Luckily, for those of us in non-swing states, we won’t see the ads during the Olympics.  The ad buys are targeted on 11 states: Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Wisconsin. The onslaught will run July 31 through August 9.  Will you boycott the Olympics if you have to watch political ads?

AND...

Is it a coincidence that six of those states are among the several embroiled in the voter suppression controversy?  In an article released today, the Brennan Center for Justice reported that 500,000 Americans could face significant challenges to their right to vote because of an inability to pay for, make time for, or find travel arrangements for the acquisition of a voting rights ID.  Many live in a rural areas, more than 10 miles from an issuing agency AND the offices close to rural areas are cutting back on their days of service.  Some are not open on weekends. 

Republican State Rep. Brandon Creighton, says tough tootsies. "The fact is is that, in rural areas, people choose to live in rural areas and they're accustomed to commutes."  Do you agree that voting rights should be impacted by where you choose to live, your age, economic status, or ethnic background in 21st century America?  Or, is voting a sacred right for all American citizens, the free access to which defines us as a nation?

How is this affecting your state? How is might it impact your local elections? Check the state-by-state map here.

What are the solutions?  Are you involved in a voter registration program in a “suppression” state? Let’s brainstorm today...do we need a “Get An ID” campaign NOW and a “Get Out the Vote” campaign for the November election?  It may be double duty, but what are the options?

Tell us what you think today at 12 noon Pacific time (3 pm ET) on Lunch with Louden.

After DISCLOSE Act Defeat, Members of Congress, Investors, Public Officials & Small Businesses Continue to Push for Transparency

Senators Menendez, Whitehouse, Merkley Commit to Continue the Fight for Disclosure of Political Spending

July 18, 2012
Contact: Lisa Gilbert 202-454-5188
Angela Bradbury (202) 588-7741

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, in the wake of a Republican filibuster of the DISCLOSE Act, small business owners joined forces with Sens. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and the Coalition for Accountability of Political Spending (CAPS), the bipartisan group of state officials led by New York City Public Advocate Bill de Blasio, to commit to continue the push for desperately needed transparency of political spending.

The public call for transparency is sought through final passage of the DISCLOSE Act and the Shareholder Protection Act, and by calling on the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to take the lead in casting light on secretive corporate political spending.

The press conference participants gathered to hammer home the point that the DISCLOSE Act filibuster is not the last chance for transparency and to stress that they will not give up on either the bill or on other transparency remedies to deal with out-of-control political spending.

At today’s event, the senators rallied with investors, small business interests and the public to pressure Congress to move ahead with disclosure legislation and for the SEC to develop rules and guidelines for responsible and transparent corporate political spending. Menendez also is championing the Shareholder Protection Act (S. 1360) to require shareholder consent of corporate political spending decisions.

For nearly a year, a petition filed by 10 law professors has been pending before the SEC. It asks the agency to require public companies to disclose their political spending to shareholders. An all-time record of 300,000 comments has been received by the agency from institutional investors, businesses and the public, urging the SEC to enact such a requirement.

The historic number of supportive comments submitted to the SEC speaks volumes about the importance and public demand for greater transparency of money in elections and for responsible corporate governance. Under the current free-for-all of unlimited corporate political spending caused by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, CEOs may simply dip into the corporate till and spend that money on elections without the consent or knowledge of shareholders. The public also remains in the dark about secret corporate spending in elections.

The campaign to open the books on corporate political spending is supported by the Corporate Reform Coalition, a broad and diverse coalition of more than 75 groups, including institutional investors, businesses and transparency activists.

The petition for rulemaking (#4-637) and the public comments on the rulemaking are available at http://www.sec.gov/rules/petitions.shtml.

Syndicate content